The Role of University Background in Shaping Social Identity and Opportunities

In the UK, higher education institutions often serve as more than just centres of academic achievement; they act as symbols of status, privilege, and social mobility. Attending a prestigious university such as Oxford, Cambridge, or a Russell Group institution can significantly impact a person’s career trajectory, often opening doors to elite networks, fast-track graduate schemes, and leadership opportunities.

However, this emphasis on university background can introduce both conscious and unconscious biases in recruitment and promotion decisions. There is an implicit assumption that a degree from an elite institution equates to superior capability, which can overshadow equally qualified candidates from less prestigious universities or those educated outside the UK. For this reason, Divrsity’s inclusion of a question about university attendance offers key insights into how educational backgrounds may shape workplace experiences and influence an organisation’s DEI strategy.

Positive Impacts on Diversity, Inclusion, Equity, and Representation

1. Understanding Educational Elitism and Representation

By analysing university background, Divrsity helps organisations identify potential overrepresentation of certain academic elites in their workforce, particularly within leadership or decision-making roles. For instance, if a company’s leadership team is disproportionately made up of Oxbridge or Russell Group graduates, this could highlight a broader issue of educational elitism. While a positive reading might signal an abundance of high-calibre talent, it may also point to systemic biases in hiring and progression practices, where candidates from more diverse educational backgrounds might be overlooked, even if they bring different but equally valuable skills to the table. We've seen many surveys where some teams significantly over-index on prestigious universities, leading us to that conclusion.

Research has shown that graduates from elite universities are often overrepresented in sectors such as law, finance, and government. This can create a narrow pool of perspectives, leading to a lack of diversity in thought, innovation, and approach. Divrsity's super-cool automated analytics regularly uncover these patterns, allowing customers to adjust their recruitment policies to ensure broader representation, not just of gender, race, or socioeconomic background, but of educational experiences as well.

2. Unveiling Hidden Bias in Career Progression

Another crucial insight that university data provides is an understanding of how alumni from different institutions progress within an organisation. Do Oxbridge or Russell Group graduates fast-track to senior roles more often than their peers? Are those from non-UK universities underrepresented in management or leadership? These questions can help organisations uncover hidden biases in their promotion and talent development practices.

Incorporating data on educational background into a DEI analysis allows organisations to measure equity in career progression, ensuring that no particular group is favoured unfairly. This helps foster a workplace culture where opportunities for advancement are genuinely meritocratic, aligned with skills and potential rather than pedigree.

3. Promoting Inclusivity Through Diverse Educational Experiences

Divrsity’s university background question can also support organisations in promoting a more inclusive culture. Employees from less prestigious universities or those educated outside the UK may feel alienated or undervalued if their educational background is not considered “elite.” This can harm their sense of belonging within the workplace, which is closely tied to engagement and retention.

Understanding the university backgrounds of employees provides a lens through which companies can assess whether they are fostering an inclusive environment. Are employees from non-Russell Group universities feeling supported, engaged, and respected? By addressing these insights, companies can craft interventions that promote greater inclusion across all educational backgrounds.

Negative Impacts on DEI: Risks and Challenges

1. The Risk of Reinforcing Biases and Existing Hierarchies

While collecting data on university background provides valuable insights, it also presents the risk of reinforcing existing biases. For instance, asking employees to declare their university may inadvertently signal to participants that educational prestige is being scrutinised, possibly exacerbating feelings of inadequacy or "imposter syndrome" among those from non-elite universities. This could undermine an organisation’s efforts to promote inclusion and equity and create a sense of "us versus them" between employees.

Moreover, organisations might use the data to justify skewed hiring practices, believing that Oxbridge or Russell Group graduates represent the "ideal" employee profile. This could perpetuate existing biases in recruitment, reducing the chances for applicants from more diverse educational or socioeconomic backgrounds to be fairly considered.

For example, assuming that all Oxbridge graduates are confident public speakers perpetuates a stereotype and may overlook individuals who struggle with imposter syndrome or social anxiety.

It's vital to frame the analysis in a way that celebrates diverse educational pathways and avoids reinforcing negative stereotypes about certain institutions.

2. Exacerbating Class Divides

University background in the UK is also deeply tied to class and socioeconomic status. Attending Oxbridge or Russell Group universities is often associated with access to better schooling, financial resources, and social capital, which are not equally available to all segments of society. By focusing too heavily on university background, organisations risk perpetuating class divides, privileging employees from wealthier or more privileged backgrounds while disadvantaging those who may have faced more barriers to educational success.

To counteract this, it is important for organisations to view university data within the broader context of socioeconomic diversity, recognising that university attendance is not always a measure of talent or potential, but often a reflection of opportunity.

3. Discrimination Through Proxy

While educational background can indicate potential socio-economic privilege, it should not be used as a substitute for directly asking about class or economic status (Financial Times, 2021). Doing so could lead to discrimination against graduates from lower-income backgrounds who attended prestigious universities through scholarships and extreme hard work. Organisations must ensure they gather data on multiple axes of diversity to avoid reinforcing biases.

A Balanced Approach to University Background Data

To harness the full potential of university background data without falling into the trap of elitism, Divrsity’s approach integrates this information into a wider framework of DEI metrics. This holistic approach ensures that insights derived from the data are used to promote diversity and inclusion rather than reinforce existing inequalities. Here are some strategies that Divrsity encourages organisations to adopt:

1. Contextual Recruitment: University background should be considered alongside other factors such as socioeconomic background, race, and gender. Employers should apply “contextual recruitment” techniques, where candidates’ achievements are viewed in light of their personal circumstances, giving those from disadvantaged backgrounds a fairer chance.
2. Ongoing Monitoring and Analysis: It’s crucial that organisations regularly review their recruitment and promotion data to ensure biases aren’t creeping into their processes. Divrsity’s AI-driven analysis can help organisations spot trends and make adjustments where necessary, ensuring that no group is disproportionately advantaged or disadvantaged based on their educational background.
3. Promoting Equitable Access to Development Opportunities: Organisations should ensure that all employees, regardless of university background, have equal access to training, mentoring, and leadership development opportunities. By fostering an inclusive culture of professional growth, companies can better support individuals from all educational backgrounds to reach their full potential.
4. Awareness & Training: Raise awareness among managers and employees about the potential biases associated with university attendance. Provide training on unconscious bias, privilege, and the impact of social mobility on career trajectories.

Sign-up now to gain data-driven workplace insights

Conclusion

The inclusion of a question on university background in Divrsity surveys serves as a powerful tool for understanding how educational pedigree impacts Diversity, Inclusion, Equity, Bias, Belonging, and Representation within the workplace. While it offers valuable insights into potential biases and disparities, it also carries the risk of reinforcing elitism if not used thoughtfully.

For HR professionals and DEI leaders, the key lies in interpreting this data holistically, recognising that diversity of thought, experience, and opportunity is just as valuable—if not more so—than traditional markers of prestige. By leveraging university background data as part of a comprehensive DEI strategy, organisations can foster a workplace where all individuals, regardless of their educational journey, feel valued, included, and empowered to succeed.

Sign-up to run your survey today

References:

1. Sutton Trust and Social Mobility Commission. (2019). Elitist Britain 2019.
2. Solicitors Regulation Authority. (2017). Diversity in the legal profession in England and Wales.
3. Social Mobility Commission. (2021). State of the Nation 2021: Social Mobility and the Pandemic.
4. Runnymede Trust. (2020). Race and Class in Post-Brexit Britain.
5. Higher Education Policy Institute (HEPI). (2020). University prestige and social mobility
6. McKinsey & Company. (2020). Diversity Wins: How Inclusion Matters. Available [here](https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-ins

Related Articles See All Blog Articles

• See the latest set of Diversity and Inclusion Survey Qeustions
• If you're a company director, then you should read our comprehensive guide to Diversity and Inclusion for UK Company Directors
• We also offer insights into meaningful changes that you can make to improve the employee experience for the 17% of your organisation that is Neurodiverse, those experiencing menopause, or those with Why Caring Responsibilities should be the 10th Protected Characterstic
• Since we're asking such personal questions, learn how Divrsity is Obsessed with Anonymity
• We love EDI Surveys, but there are Legal and Ethical considerations that you should consider
• How does the Divrsity AI work?
• Use Collective Surveys to survey employees who don't work at a desk
• Learn why we created Divrsity
• Or explore one of the articles in our Diversity Dictionary Series: Intersectionality, Ableism, Transgender, Allyship, Performative DEI and Anti-racist.